Neither the Complainant nor the Respondent is required to say anything at the hearing. If something as fundamentally reactionary as fraternity membership was going to replace something as fundamentally radical as student unrest, it would need to align itself with someone whose bona fides among young, white, middle-class males were unassailable. And why do the lawsuits against fraternities for this kind of serious injury and death—so predictable and so preventable—have such a hard time getting traction? Results of the Appeal Panel. The Appeal Panel may: The student may, at any time and for a reasonable period of time, confer with the Advisor. Fraternities really do breed leaders—a cohort of young men dedicated to being loyal, being knowledgeable, and embracing the skills of leadership success. What will happen to Larry now? Suddenly their beer bashes and sorority mixers, their panty raids and obsession with the big game, seemed impossibly reactionary when compared with the mind-altering drugs being sampled in off-campus apartments where sexual liberation was being born and the Little Red Book proved, if nothing else, a fantastic coaster for a leaky bong. As for the exorbitant cost of providing the young man with a legal defense for the civil case in which, of course, there are no public defenders , that is money he and his parents are going to have to scramble to come up with, perhaps transforming the family home into an ATM to do it. They also include the March conviction of Jesse M. A report should be submitted as soon as possible after the event takes place. Unless the panel chair is a Hearing Officer appointed to serve as chair without a vote, the panel chair shall participate in all votes, and all Hearing Panel decisions shall be made by a majority vote. He had attended a party at SAE of which he was not a member and then wandered, apparently drunk and lost, for five miles before freezing to death under a bridge.