Information about sexual activity or drug and alcohol practices of youth, if disclosed by the researcher, can jeopardize the physical safety of youth or lead to their prosecution for unlawful behavior. The important matter is that strategies to manage these challenges should be completely rational and practical according to each context. The Board's discussion will include the factors outlined below and perhaps others that are not apparent from the short description of the research study described earlier in this section. The process of article selection is described in Figure 1. Rogers provided the IRB with details of the safeguards designed to detect, prevent, and treat all potential harmful effects of study participation. Harm to human subjects is not limited to physical injury. Rogers submitted to the IRB the theoretical framework for the study and the results of a preliminary investigation with a similar population of youth. No psychological, social, or economic harms are anticipated relative to invasion of privacy and confidentiality of records; youth data collection, analysis, and storage processes have built-in safeguards. Then, all the content was analyzed and categorized, and ethical challenges were fully described. Psychological harms in the form of guilt or embarrassment may result; however, Dr. Ensure disclosure of risks and benefits. Concerns about privacy are often associated with the methods that researchers utilize to obtain behavioral, emotional, intellectual, or physical information about research participants.